The past week or so have seen a flurry of letters to newspapers and comments on this and other blogs about the Laidlaw Energy project in Berlin. I've personally read several newspaper stories out of Ellicottville New York and I must admit that I'm beginning to see more and more similarities in the tone and style of the Laidlaw officials and supporters here in Berlin. I've often posted that the supporters of Laidlaw are "cult like" and have a complete disregard for factual information. For example, the wood availability studies put into question the available fuel source for Laidlaw, but instead of pointing directly at what they perceive as flawed data they suggest throwing the whole study out as "out of date". When anybody mentions the limited capacity of the transmission lines they don't challenge the data from ISO New England or PUC, they just suggest that they have a secret plan. When someone discovers that at a biomass plant in Maine that one of the principals of Laidlaw is involved with experimented with a variety of fuels from human waste to carpet trimmings, the issue is deflected by saying the town knew about it. The truth appears to be that the town was told after the fact and after residents blew the whistle. The Laidlaw officials told Berlin's Mayor and Council that the existing boiler in Berlin can only burn clean wood chips, but a closer investigation reveals that the type of boiler system being proposed lends itself to burn all forms of combustible materials and is the best type for burning garbage and construction debris. (Keep in mind the make or break issue is the cost of fuel) As I said before, a newspaper person in Ellicottville NY said that a popular saying in that town is; "How can you tell when officials from Laidlaw are lying? When their lips are moving". If Berlin is blessed with Laidlaw, I suggest that City officials begin looking for Environmental Engineering firms to hire to help set standards and to monitor stack emissions from the power plant. From everything I've learned about Laidlaw and its officials over the past couple years, it's obvious that they're not to be trusted. When asking Laidlaw officials about technical matters we better be prepared to have the expertise at hand to scrutinize the answers. Finally, we're subjecting ourselves to all of this for what? The promise of 40 jobs and tax payments, both of which are debatable and questionable. For example, New Hampshire law allows biomass plants to apply for tax abatement's. Do you really believe that Laidlaw will pay on their full assessment? (I have a bridge in NY for sale) Why is the Laidlaw plant going to have 40 employees when there isn't another plant anywhere that has more than 20 to 25? (Gets those local laborers cheering at meetings) "A sucker is born every minute" a wise man once said and we're being suckered!