« What's in a "spat"? | Main | Medals & Badges »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8352ed46869e2015435c06bdb970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference A GPS moment:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
We can thank the Federal government for this fiasco. They know what's best for us!
Posted by: Antonio Andolini | September 28, 2011 at 12:21 PM
What Antonio, you don't think that there should be some.....ballance? What would you suggest?
Posted by: Rocky | September 28, 2011 at 02:17 PM
The prison inmates were counted as part of a Ward...didn't think they were allowed to vote?
Posted by: toonist | September 28, 2011 at 03:10 PM
They remain citizens don't they?
Posted by: Rocky | September 28, 2011 at 03:29 PM
But can they vote while in jail?
Posted by: toonist | September 28, 2011 at 03:36 PM
I know what Obama would do. He'd assign this problem to a joint commission made up of 18 members from each party. Then they'd come up with a recommendation that was non-binding and nobody did anything with. Nice!
Posted by: Wing Nut | September 28, 2011 at 04:59 PM
sorry...I just can't stop laughing over the grenier/rosek dilemma. perhaps a game of football to determine if prisoner votes count such as in "The longest yard" with grenier and rosek playing ball along with them?
Posted by: jon | September 28, 2011 at 05:19 PM
I'm still laughing, as well. Nice one, toonist.
It doesn't matter if you are or are not eligible to vote, it doesn't matter if you are a citizen; if you were present, you were counted. Unfortunately, it is this US Census count that is used to determine representation and, in this case, where registered voters will cast their ballot. So, responsible citizens who bother to exercise their right to vote get inconvenienced by transients, felons and bureaucrats.
Convicted felons cannot vote while locked up.
Posted by: Antonio Andolini | September 28, 2011 at 05:52 PM
"...and I can't find my way home."
Posted by: Antonio Andolini | September 28, 2011 at 05:59 PM
Thanks AA. I din't think they could.
@Wing Nut: Who's your favorite: Bill, Loofa Sponge, O'Reilly or Sponge Bob Squarepants?
Posted by: toonist | September 28, 2011 at 06:00 PM
Rocky, if you check into it, you will find that many inmates are not citizens.
Posted by: Antonio Andolini | September 28, 2011 at 06:09 PM
Oh no!!!! Illegals!!!! They related to some of the people running around Berlin????
Posted by: toonist | September 28, 2011 at 06:18 PM
Of course they can't vote if they're not citizens Antonio, but if they are I believe they do vote. Wouldn't be funny if Berlin elected a mayor through the votes from the prison! I wonder if candidates will go campaigning in there? Once the Fed prison opens and with the State prison, roughly 2,000 votes! (if citizens)It's the largest voting block in the City......
Posted by: Rocky | September 28, 2011 at 07:17 PM
Tut, tut, toonist, they're "undocumented." Until they committed crimes, got caught, were tried and convicted. Now they're well documented with mug shots and convict numbers and DNA in the Federal database. They'll do their time on our dime and then get deported. They're a slap in the face to those who play by the rules and enter this nation through proper channels like my grandparents did.
Criminaliens.
Posted by: Antonio Andolini | September 28, 2011 at 07:28 PM
Rocky, you cannot vote while serving a felony sentence. If you are being held pretrial (innocent until proven guilty), you could vote. It's not likely that you would be at Northern Correctional Facility if not convicted. I suppose if you were enough of a risk or problem that they could not keep you in a county jail while being held pretrial or serving a misdemeanor sentence, you could end up there.
The really sad part of all this is the record low turnout of registered voters in many elections.
Posted by: Antonio Andolini | September 28, 2011 at 07:46 PM
Just reading tomorrow's BDS and mayor Grenier's announcement that he'll be running again. What I found interesting in the article was not only his self proclaimed success at bringing the Laidlaw/Cate Street biomass plant to reality, but his refusal to endorse Councilman McCue. I bet Mr. McCue is all broken up over that fact. Congratulations Mr. McCue, you must be doing something right!
Posted by: Rocky | September 28, 2011 at 08:49 PM
Hey Jon, been to court lately?? Hummmmm? Just asking???
Posted by: wood burner | September 28, 2011 at 09:07 PM
Got a pic of this Mr. McCue?
Posted by: toonist | September 28, 2011 at 09:08 PM
Is Councilor McCue even running? Seems to be an assumption, and you know what they say when you assume. Typical BDS crack journalism.
"Grenier specifically declined to endorse the re-election of Councilor Tom McCue, who was an opponent of the Laidlaw biomass project. Working together, Grenier said the present council has promoted new employment opportunities, kept the tax rate down, and improved both the quality of life and the attitude in the city." Now that's consistent. Heaven help us all.
Posted by: Antonio Andolini | September 28, 2011 at 09:16 PM
I'll see if I can come up with a photo.
Posted by: Rocky | September 28, 2011 at 09:36 PM
Oh, there's another story about the elections. Hmm, seems the current members of City Council are running with the exception of Councilor Evans, the true libertarian.
So, with the filing period still open until October 11, the BDS has made Mr. Grenier's preferences public. Democracy in action.
Nevertheless, be sure to VOTE, folks!
Posted by: Antonio Andolini | September 28, 2011 at 09:57 PM
...and the beat goes on. "elected officials" steal away with credit where they can and lazy guys with big bellies wait for their "disability" check to come in on the first with hopes their wives get longer hours at the local eatery. it's all in the same category...just another day.
Posted by: jon | September 29, 2011 at 05:50 AM
Actually Toonist, I like both of them.
Posted by: Wing Nut | September 29, 2011 at 07:34 AM
"It's just another day for you and me in Paradise." Phil Collins
Posted by: Antonio Andolini | September 29, 2011 at 08:20 AM
"I now fully believe that the shareholders are getting robbed and Bartoszek is nothing more than a con artist".
I always suspected that was the case, however I was willing to give him the benefit of the doubt, and that has cost me dearly. His and the actions of Laidlaw have now convinced me that Mike and company are nothing more than thieves, who have repeatedly taken advantage of trusting shareholders. Until Mike proves otherwise he is just another con man out to make a buck. (This is a I-HUB comment from a Laidlaw shareholder) Isn't this what Jon and some of us were saying 4 years ago? I wonder if The Berlin Daily Sun will run any of these comments from shareholders?
Posted by: Rocky | September 29, 2011 at 10:14 AM